人工智能如何帮助人类学习古诗
人工智能在学习古诗方面可以为人类提供一些帮助。例如,人工智能可以通过分析大量的古诗文本,提取出其中的语言模式和结构,帮助人类更好地理解和记忆古诗。此外,人工智能还可以通过语音识别和自然语言处理技术,将古诗转化为语音或文本,帮助人类更方便地学习和背诵古诗。
然而,需要注意的是,人工智能并不能完全取代人类在学习古诗方面的作用。学习古诗需要人类的情感和思维参与,需要人类通过自己的感受和理解来体会古诗的意境和情感。因此,人工智能在学习古诗方面的作用应该是辅助性的,而不是替代性的。
总之,人工智能可以为人类学习古诗提供一些帮助,但并不能完全取代人类的学习和思考。
So can AI help us automatically create such explanations?To do so it must in a sense have a model for what we humans understand—and how we express this understanding in words,etc.It doesn’t do much good to say “here are 100 computational steps that produce this result”.To get a “human-level explanation” we need to break this down into pieces that humans can assimilate.那么人工智能可以帮助我们自动创建这样的解释吗?要做到这一点,它在某种意义上必须有一个我们人类理解的模型,以及我们如何用语言表达这种理解等。说“这是产生这个结果的100个计算步骤”并没有多大用处。为了获得“人类水平的解释”,我们需要将其分解为人类可以吸收的部分。As an example,consider a mathematical proof,generated by automated theorem proving:作为一个例子,考虑一个由自动定理证明生成的数学证明:
So can AI—as we’ve been discussing it here—be expected to do this?It doesn’t seem likely.AI is typically something trained on existing human material,intended to extrapolate directly from that.It’s not something built to “go out into the wilds of the ruliad”,far from anything already connected to humans.那么,正如我们在这里讨论的那样,人工智能可以做到这一点吗?看来不太可能。人工智能通常是根据现有的人类材料进行训练的,旨在直接从中推断。它不是为了“进入鲁利亚德的荒野”而建造的,远离任何已经与人类相关的东西。
But,for the most part,we had moved past memorization.We were now in a largely print-based culture and memorization just wasn’t too important anymore.For many people,this tradeoff is a good thing.Why memorize it if you can access the knowledge with technology?However,when I was in college,I decided to memorize key texts that I wanted with me at all times.I memorized Bible verses and Shakespearan stanzas.I memorized an ee cummings poem and a quote from bell hooks.I memorized Stoic passages and the every word of the Bill of Rights.Since then,I have forgotten many of the lines of poetry.But the act of memorizing text allowed me to slow down and think harder about the meaning of the text.Yes,I was memorizing it.But I was also meditating.Decades later,when I experience a high anxiety day,I will still recite back Philippians 4:6-7.In addition,learning how to memorize text also taught me how to remember conversations I had with people at greater length.It taught me to remember books I had read.As students move away from our K-12 classrooms,they will need to decide which skills they want to continue to use even if AI can do it for them.Some might feel that coding / programming should be something AI does and therefore they won’t learn to code.Maybe that’s okay.After all,I don’t make my own clothing.I choose to outsource and automate it.The key thing is that they learn how to think critically about when they use and don’t use AI.That requires students to move away from a state where AI is the default.Be Careful About Using AI as the Default